next up previous contents
Next: Synchrotron Radiation Up: Background Previous: Background

Collimation and Muons

In this section we discuss the production of muons through the interaction of particles in the beam tails when they are collimated at the upstream collimation sections.

Generally, the transverse profile of the beam does not exactly follow a Gaussian distribution at linear colliders. The beams can be accompanied by long tails according to experience from experiments at SLC [4]. While the origin of these tails is not thoroughly understood at present, we shall conservatively assume that the beam has a flat tail beyond tex2html_wrap_inline1215 in both the horizontal(x) and vertical(y) directions with a relative intensity of 1%.

As can be seen in the next section, the beam must be collimated within tex2html_wrap_inline1217 and tex2html_wrap_inline1219 in order to keep the background due to synchrotron radiation at a manageable level. Since the typical size of the beam core is on the order of a few tex2html_wrap_inline1221m, collimating such beams is a seriously non-trivial task. A work-around is to expand only the tail part sufficiently by using a non-linear collimation technique, as discussed in Chapter 13. This is part of the reason why a 1200 m-long collimator section is required for collimating a 0.75 TeV beam.

As stated in Chapter 2 and subsequent chapters, one RF pulse will accelerate a bunch train which contains up to 85 bunches separated by 1.4 nsec at a repetition rate of 150Hz. Since each bunch consists of tex2html_wrap_inline1223 electrons (or positrons) at the IP, about tex2html_wrap_inline1225(1%tail)tex2html_wrap_inline1227(bunches) electrons may hit collimators at 150 Hz. In the interactions of the beam tails with the collimators a large number of muons are produced through the Bethe-Heitler process, tex2html_wrap_inline1229. Without suitable measures these muons would traverse through the tunnel and create a large amount energy deposit within the detector facility. They would cause serious background problems for conducting high-energy physics experiments.

Figure 14.2: Original idea of a muon attenuator. Two iron pipes are magnetized axially in opposite directions for both charged muons, which can be trapped, where the 120m length of the iron pipe corresponds to a mean range of 250GeV muons.  

Several techniques have been invented so far to reduce the muon background at linear colliders. The first is the ``muon spoiler" idea, which was implemented at SLC. There, a set of large iron toroid magnets are installed in the beam line to over-focus the muons, so that they are dispersed away from the detector.

In the design study here, another method, which is called ``muon attenuator", is considered. This idea was first proposed by by E.A.Kushnirenko [5]. The principle idea is to confine tex2html_wrap_inline1231 and tex2html_wrap_inline1233 inside two iron pipes magnetized axially in opposite directions, and to absorb the muons by the energy loss. A schematic diagram of this scheme is shown in Figure 14.2. We have performed a simulation study on the attenuation of muon flux onto the detector when this technique is applied. In the present JLC design there are six collimators in the collimation section between 1840 m and 2856 m, as measured from the IP. Various effects of long iron pipe shield of the attenuator was investigated with and without magnetization. The best condition was found to be the case with no magnetization in the iron pipes.

The outer and inner radius of the iron pipe shield are 31 and 1 cm, respectively. The beam pipe is located inside the iron pipes. The beam line between 1721 m to 2856 m from the IP except for the collimators is assumed to be covered with the iron shield. Muons that penetrate through the collimation section are bent by the big bend (+7 mrad, see Figure 14.1) and go through the tunnel of 3.5 mtex2html_wrap_inline1237. In this study a second bending magnet(-3.28 mrad) is assumed to be located at 80 m from the IP. This is so to make the horizontal beam crossing, although the actual design has several bending magnets distributed in the final focus system. Sand stone is assumed to surround the tunnel. The cross section of the tunnel is shown in Figure 4.78 of Ref.[1].

Figure 14.3 shows the result of the simulation. The horizontal axis gives the locations of collimators, as measured from the IP in meters. They correspond to the origins of muons. The vertical axis gives the number of electrons that are required to hit the collimators so that one muon produced out of these would to hit a detector of tex2html_wrap_inline1241mtex2html_wrap_inline1243 volume size.

Figure 14.3: Number of electrons to produce one muon which reaches the IP.  

The solid circle, solid triangle and open circle symbols correspond to cases of the beam energies of 250 GeV without the iron shield, 500 GeV without the shield and 250 GeV with the shield, respectively. The result of the simulation can be summarized as below:

The ``first" two collimators that are farthest from the IP are for momentum collimation, while the subsequent two sets would collimate elliptically the transverse beam profile (tex2html_wrap_inline1247) twice. A smearing effect, due to edge scattering off collimator jaws, has been calculated to be tex2html_wrap_inline1249 beyond the edges of the ellipse by a single collimation. Consequently, from these results, we can estimate that at most 10 muons may traverse the detector at 150 Hz. Although this result seems to be acceptable for experiments, a further reduction of factor of 10 should be pursued for an additional safety margin. This additional reduction will be realized if muon spoilers are implemented in the final focus system, as studied in the NLC-ZDR[6].

next up previous contents
Next: Synchrotron Radiation Up: Background Previous: Background

Toshiaki Tauchi
Thu, May 29, 1997 04:47:48 PM