%\documentstyle[amsfonts,epsfig,portland]{aipproc}
\documentstyle[epsfig,longtable]{aipproc}

\begin{document}
\title{Reliability of the Models\\ and Their Match with Observations}

\author{Steven E. Brown$^*$ and Gerard M. Steiner$^{\dagger}$}
\address{$^*$National Center for Atmospheric Research\thanks{The National
Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National
Science Foundation.}\\
Boulder Colorado 80307\\
$^{\dagger}$National Standards Institute, Boulder, Colorado 11543}

%\lefthead{LEFT head}
%\righthead{RIGHT head}
\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
This is \verb+samp2.tex+ --- a sample input file for \verb+aipproc+.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
\end{abstract}

\section*{Introduction}
%\[
%\widehat{a} + \widehat{ab} + \widehat{abc} + \widehat{abcd}
%\]
%
%%\show\frak
% 
%\[
%%      {\bf x}^{\bf x} \triangleq z 
%      {\bf x}^{\bf x}\triangleq{z} \tensor{T} \frak{E^E}=\frak{mc}^2
%%      {\bf x}^{\bf x}\triangleq {z} \tensor{T} \frak{E}=\frak{mc}^2
%\]
% 
%\[
%{\Bbb {NQRZ}} \qquad \because \eth\ggg\bigstar \therefore\blacktriangleright\rightsquigarrow \blacksquare
%\]
% 

The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
%$\blacksquare$The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system 
\cite{smith82,jones78,jonessmith80}.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
\begin{equation}
\Delta T_{2c} = \frac{S_C}{S_T} \ln (2)
\end{equation}
 
\begin{eqnarray}
\sum \vert M^{\rm viol}_g \vert ^2&=&g^{2n-4}_S(Q^2)~N^{n-2}
        (N^2-1)\nonumber \\
 & &\times \left( \sum_{i<j}\right)
  \sum_{\rm perm}
 {1 \over S_{12}}
 {1 \over S_{12}}\sum_\tau c^f_\tau~.
\end{eqnarray}


The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
\begin{equation}
\Delta T_{2c} = \int^t_0 F(\tau) \left[\frac{S_C}{S_T}\right] - S_T \Delta T(t)
\end{equation}

The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system. See Figure
 \ref{fig1}.


\begin{figure}[b!] % fig 1
\centerline{\epsfig{file=got.ps,height=3.5in,width=3.5in}}
\vspace{10pt}
\caption{Concentration profile climatology and climate model situation.}
\label{fig1}
\end{figure}


\section*{Special Numbering and Extra Symbols}
To obtain numbers not normally produced by the automatic numbering,
use the \verb+\eqnum{#1}+ command, where \verb+#1+ is the desired
equation number. For example, to get an equation number of
(\ref{eq:mynum}),
\begin{equation}
g^+g^+ \rightarrow g^+g^+g^+g^+ \dots ~,~~q^+q^+\rightarrow
q^+g^+g^+ \dots ~. \eqnum{1.2$'$}\label{eq:mynum}
\end{equation}
 
{\it A few notes on} \verb=\eqnum{#1}=.
The \verb+\eqnum{#1}+ must come before the \verb+\label{#1}+, if any.
The numbering set with \verb+\eqnum{#1}+ is {\it transparent} to the
automatic numbering in REV\TeX{}; therefore,
you must know the number ahead of time, and {\it must\/} make
sure that the number set with \verb+\eqnum{#1}+ stays in step
with the automatic numbering.
\verb+\eqnum{#1}+ works with both single-line and multiline equations.
You could, if you wished, do all the numbering in a paper
manually with \verb+\eqnum{#1}+.
 
Enclosing single-line and multiline equations in
\verb+\begin{mathletters}+ and \verb+\end{mathletters}+ will produce
a set of equations that are ``numbered'' with letters, as shown
in Eqs.\ (\ref{mlett:1}) and (\ref{mlett:2}) below:
\begin{mathletters}
\label{generallabel}
\begin{equation}
\left\{abc123456abcdef\alpha\beta\gamma\delta%
1234556\alpha\beta{1\sum^{a}_{b}\over A^2}\right\},\label{mlett:1}
\end{equation}
\begin{eqnarray}
{\cal M}=&&ig_Z^2(4E_1E_2)^{1/2}(l_i^2)^{-1}
(g_{\sigma_2}^e)^2\chi_{-\sigma_2}(p_2)\nonumber\\
&&\times
[\epsilon_i]_{\sigma_1}\chi_{\sigma_1}(p_1).\label{mlett:2}
\end{eqnarray}
\end{mathletters}
If you use a \verb+\label{#1}+ command right after the
\verb+\begin{mathletters}+, then \verb+\ref{#1}+ can be used to reference
all the equations in a mathletters environment. For example, the equations
in the preceding mathletters environment were Eqs.\ (\ref{generallabel}).
 
The AIP book style will support all the ``normal'' \TeX{} and  \LaTeX{}
symbols, and in addition, the following symbols
 
\begin{tabbing}
\verb+\corresponds+\hspace{2pc} \=$\corresponds\hspace{10pc}$
\= \verb+\gtrsim+\hspace{2pc} \= $\gtrsim $\\
\verb+\lesssim+ \>$\lesssim$ \> \verb+\precsim+ \>$\precsim$ \\
\verb+\succsim+ \>$\succsim$ \> \verb+\lambdabar+ \>$\lambdabar$ \\
\verb+\tensor{T}+ \>$\tensor{T}$
\end{tabbing}

The following is a longtable; See Table \ref{T:17:12}.
 
\begin{aiptable}
\begin{longtable}{lrrrrr}
\caption{Representative symbiotic stars.The organization of the archive was de
bated at great length. We hope it
will be useful. If you don't like our organization, feel free to move the fil
es around as you see fit, not forgetting to redefine the}
\label{T:17:12}
\\\aftercapline
Name &  Other Name & $\alpha_{2000}$  &  $\delta_{2000}$ & $l_{\rm II}$
  & $b_{\rm II}$ \\
\afterheadline\endfirsthead
\caption{\it Continued.}
\\\aftercapline
Name &  Other Name & $\alpha_{2000}$  &  $\delta_{2000}$ & $l_{\rm II}$
  & $b_{\rm II}$ \\
\afterheadline\endhead
\hline\endfoot
\hline\endlastfoot
 EG And &  HD 4174 & 00:44:37.1 & +40:40:46.7 &  121.5 & -22.2 \\
 AX Per &  MWC 411 & 01:36:17    & +54:15:36 & 129.5 & -8.0  \\
 BX Mon &  AS 150 & 07:25:24  & -03:36:00 & 220.0 &  5.9  \\
 RX Pup &  HD 69190 & 08:14:12  & -41:42:24 &  258.5 & -3.9  \\
 SY Mus &  HD 100336 & 11:32:05.5  & -65:25:07 & 294.8 & -3.8 \\
 AG Dra &  -- & 16:01:40.9 & +66:48:09.7 & 100.3  & 41.0 \\
 RT Ser &  MWC 265 & 17:39:52 & -11:56:42 &  13.9 &  10.0 \\
 AR Pav &  MWC 600 & 18:20:28  &  -66:04:48 & 328.5 & -21.6 \\
 BF Cyg &  MWC 315 & 19:23:53.2 & +29:40:26  &  62.9 &  6.7  \\
 CH Cyg &  HD 182917 & 19:24:33.0 & +50:14:29.7 &  81.8 & 15.6\\
 HM Sge &  -- & 19:41:57.0 & +16:44:40  & 53.6 & -3.2 \\
 CI Cyg &  MWC 415 & 19:50:12    & +35:41:06 &  70.9 &  4.7  \\
 V1016 Cyg & AS 373 & 19:57:05 & +39:49:48 &  75.2 &  5.7 \\
 RR Tel &  Hen 1811 & 20:04:16  & -55:43:18 & 342.2 & -32.2  \\
 V1329 Cyg & HBV 475 & 20:51:01 & +35:34:54 &  77.8 & -5.5 \\
 AG Peg &  HD\tablenote{Longtable note 1.} 207757 & 21:51:01.9 & +12:37:32.0  &
69.3 & -30.9\\
 Z And\tablenote{Longtable note 2.}  &  HD 221650 & 23:33:39.9 & +48:49:06.3  &
110.0 & -12.1 \\
 R Aqr  &  HD 222800 & 23:43:49.3 &  -15:17:02.7 &  66.5 & -70.3  \\
\end{longtable}
\end{aiptable}


\section*{Policy-Analytic Approach}

The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
See Table \ref{table1}.
\begin{table}[b!]
\caption{This table does not expand to the  table does not ah ah ah expand to ta
ble does NOT expand to textwidth.}
\label{table1}
%\begin{tabular}{lrrr}
%\begin{tabular}{lccc}
\begin{tabular}{lddd}
   Main sample& Secondary result&
   \multicolumn{1}{c}{Previous result\tablenote{First demonstrate that
state-of-the-model climate models are credible simulators of the true climate
system.}} &
  \multicolumn{1}{c}{Change\tablenote{Estimated 2.}(\%)}\\
\tableline
Harkonen {\it et al.} & 34.5 & 24.5 & $-$23. \\
Deckard and Batty & 24.5 & 28.5 & $-13$. \\
Marcin & 134.5 & 999999224.5 & 53. \\
\end{tabular}
\end{table}


\subsection*{Atmospheric Model}


The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system 
\cite{jones78}.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.

The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.

\subsubsection*{Quantitative Differences}

The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.

\paragraph*{High-$T_c$ calculations.}
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.

\paragraph*{High-$T_c$ calculations.}
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true dynamic climate 
system \cite{jonessmith80}.

The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true dynamic climate system.  
%%% 209
%   Previous result\tablenote{Estimated The objectives of situations with.}& Change\tablenote{bbare to compar e climate model situations with.}(\%)\\
%%% 209

%\landscape
\subsubsection*{Qualitative Differences}

The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.


\begin{references}
\bibitem{smith82}Smith A., and Doe B., {\it J. Chem.\  Phys.}\ {\bf
76}, 4056 (1982).
\bibitem{jones78}Jones, C., {\it J. Chem.\ Phys.} {\bf 68}, 5298 (1978).
\bibitem{jonessmith80}Jones, C.,  and Smith, A.,
{\it Title of Book}, New York: IEEE Press, 1978, ch. 6, pp. 23-26.
\end{references}
 
\end{document}

  
