- ...too.
- Following this logic more faithfully,
CAIN should have adopted the word
SYNCHROTRONRADIATION instead of BEAMSTRAHLUNG.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...(default=6)
- The input file number
is set to 5. If you want to change it,
see the variable RDFL in the file
'21b/source/control/main/initlz.f'.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...&#;'175.
-
There is no such a rule that
a user parameter name must not be identical to some
keyword. Here, however, there is an inconsistency of
grammer. If you define a parameter with the name
ST, for example, PRINT ST may be understood
as printing the parameter or printing the statistics,
unless the keyword PARAMETER is explicitly
written.
This can be avoided by writing PRINT (ST)
because (ST) is not a keyword but is an expression
actually identical to ST.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...printed.
-
A known bug. W RITE (i=1,2), FORMAT=('nothing');
will not work as you expect in FORTRAN.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...NAME="2474">,
- If you have a proper
access, you can also find the files in the directory cbpguest/snowmass
at beams.lbl.gov or in the directory yokoya at jlcux1.kek.jp.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...361).
-
Actually, [3] adopts left-handed basis after
collision so that the first and
the second components of 503#503 are 504#504 and 505#505
in [3].
Our 502#502 is not 506#506 but
507#507.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...[#LL##1#].
- The term 515#515 is given in eq(4.6) in [4]
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...approximation
- This should be treated by the
CFQED command. If users want, EXTERNALFIELD command will be
rewritten so as to accept varying fields.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...form
-
The formulas bellow adopt the kinematics in a frame where the incident particle
energy is much higher than electron mass and collide with the laser head-on.
Actually, CAIN is valid in more general case. See Sec.A.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...Calculate
-
This must be much smaller than 1.
Otherwise, the probability of emitting more than
one photon during 223#223 cannot be ignored.
The maximum 590#590 is defined by the keyword PMAX.
When 376#376 is very large, 590#590 is suppressed by
the factor 591#591. However, in defining 223#223
(by the number of steps in PUSH command) so as to make 590#590 small
enough, you have to omit this factor because the energy of some electrons
can be much smaller after first radiation.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...flat.
-
The definition of y has changed since ABEL and CAIN in order
to keep high efficiency even when 376#376 is extremely large.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...by
-
The upper limit y=1 is not regorous. The recoil effect must be taken
into account when y is large.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.