%\documentstyle[amsfonts,epsfig,portland]{aipproc}
\documentstyle[epsfig]{aipproc}

\begin{document}
\title{Reliability of the Models\\ and Their Match with Observations}

\author{Steven E. Brown$^*$ and Gerard M. Steiner$^{\dagger}$}
\address{$^*$National Center for Atmospheric Research\thanks{The National
Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National
Science Foundation.}\\
Boulder Colorado 80307\\
$^{\dagger}$National Standards Institute, Boulder, Colorado 11543}

%\lefthead{LEFT head}
%\righthead{RIGHT head}
\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
This is \verb+samp1.tex+ --- a sample input file for \verb+aipproc+.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
\end{abstract}

\section*{Introduction}
%\[
%\widehat{a} + \widehat{ab} + \widehat{abc} + \widehat{abcd}
%\]
%
%%\show\frak
% 
%\[
%%      {\bf x}^{\bf x} \triangleq z 
%      {\bf x}^{\bf x}\triangleq{z} \tensor{T} \frak{E^E}=\frak{mc}^2
%%      {\bf x}^{\bf x}\triangleq {z} \tensor{T} \frak{E}=\frak{mc}^2
%\]
% 
%\[
%{\Bbb {NQRZ}} \qquad \because \eth\ggg\bigstar \therefore\blacktriangleright\rightsquigarrow \blacksquare
%\]
% 

The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
%$\blacksquare$The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system 
\cite{smith82,jones78,jonessmith80}.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
\begin{equation}
\Delta T_{2c} = \frac{S_C}{S_T} \ln (2)
\end{equation}
 
\begin{eqnarray}
\sum \vert M^{\rm viol}_g \vert ^2&=&g^{2n-4}_S(Q^2)~N^{n-2}
        (N^2-1)\nonumber \\
 & &\times \left( \sum_{i<j}\right)
  \sum_{\rm perm}
 {1 \over S_{12}}
 {1 \over S_{12}}\sum_\tau c^f_\tau~.
\end{eqnarray}


The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
\begin{equation}
\Delta T_{2c} = \int^t_0 F(\tau) \left[\frac{S_C}{S_T}\right] - S_T \Delta T(t)
\end{equation}

The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system. See Figure
 \ref{fig1}.


\begin{figure}[b!] % fig 1
\centerline{\epsfig{file=got.ps,height=3.5in,width=3.5in}}
\vspace{10pt}
\caption{Concentration profile climatology and climate model situation.}
\label{fig1}
\end{figure}

The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.

\section*{Special Numbering and Extra Symbols}
To obtain numbers not normally produced by the automatic numbering,
use the \verb+\eqnum{#1}+ command, where \verb+#1+ is the desired
equation number. For example, to get an equation number of
(\ref{eq:mynum}),
\begin{equation}
g^+g^+ \rightarrow g^+g^+g^+g^+ \dots ~,~~q^+q^+\rightarrow
q^+g^+g^+ \dots ~. \eqnum{1.2$'$}\label{eq:mynum}
\end{equation}
 
{\it A few notes on} \verb=\eqnum{#1}=.
The \verb+\eqnum{#1}+ must come before the \verb+\label{#1}+, if any.
The numbering set with \verb+\eqnum{#1}+ is {\it transparent} to the
automatic numbering in REV\TeX{}; therefore,
you must know the number ahead of time, and {\it must\/} make
sure that the number set with \verb+\eqnum{#1}+ stays in step
with the automatic numbering.
\verb+\eqnum{#1}+ works with both single-line and multiline equations.
You could, if you wished, do all the numbering in a paper
manually with \verb+\eqnum{#1}+.
 
Enclosing single-line and multiline equations in
\verb+\begin{mathletters}+ and \verb+\end{mathletters}+ will produce
a set of equations that are ``numbered'' with letters, as shown
in Eqs.\ (\ref{mlett:1}) and (\ref{mlett:2}) below:
\begin{mathletters}
\label{generallabel}
\begin{equation}
\left\{abc123456abcdef\alpha\beta\gamma\delta%
1234556\alpha\beta{1\sum^{a}_{b}\over A^2}\right\},\label{mlett:1}
\end{equation}
\begin{eqnarray}
{\cal M}=&&ig_Z^2(4E_1E_2)^{1/2}(l_i^2)^{-1}
(g_{\sigma_2}^e)^2\chi_{-\sigma_2}(p_2)\nonumber\\
&&\times
[\epsilon_i]_{\sigma_1}\chi_{\sigma_1}(p_1).\label{mlett:2}
\end{eqnarray}
\end{mathletters}
If you use a \verb+\label{#1}+ command right after the
\verb+\begin{mathletters}+, then \verb+\ref{#1}+ can be used to reference
all the equations in a mathletters environment. For example, the equations
in the preceding mathletters environment were Eqs.\ (\ref{generallabel}).
 
The AIP book style will support all the ``normal'' \TeX{} and  \LaTeX{}
symbols, and in addition, the following symbols
 
\begin{tabbing}
\verb+\corresponds+\hspace{2pc} \=$\corresponds\hspace{10pc}$
\= \verb+\gtrsim+\hspace{2pc} \= $\gtrsim $\\
\verb+\lesssim+ \>$\lesssim$ \> \verb+\precsim+ \>$\precsim$ \\
\verb+\succsim+ \>$\succsim$ \> \verb+\lambdabar+ \>$\lambdabar$ \\
\verb+\tensor{T}+ \>$\tensor{T}$
\end{tabbing}
 

\section*{Policy-Analytic Approach}

The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
See Table \ref{table1}.

\subsection*{Atmospheric Model}


The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system 
\cite{jones78}.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.

\subsubsection*{Quantitative Differences}

The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.

\paragraph*{High-$T_c$ calculations.}
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.

\paragraph*{High-$T_c$ calculations.}
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true dynamic climate 
system \cite{jonessmith80}.

The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true dynamic climate system.  
%%% 209
\begin{table}
\caption{This table does not expand to the  table does not ah ah ah expand to ta
ble does NOT expand to textwidth.}
\label{table1}
%\begin{tabular}{lrrr}
%\begin{tabular}{lccc}
\begin{tabular}{lddd}
   Main sample& Secondary result&
   \multicolumn{1}{c}{Previous result\tablenote{First demonstrate that
state-of-the-model climate models are credible simulators of the true climate
system.}} &
  \multicolumn{1}{c}{Change\tablenote{Estimated 2.}(\%)}\\
\tableline
Harkonen {\it et al.} & 34.5 & 24.5 & $-$23. \\
Deckard and Batty & 24.5 & 28.5 & $-13$. \\
Marcin & 134.5 & 999999224.5 & 53. \\
\end{tabular}
\end{table}

%   Previous result\tablenote{Estimated The objectives of situations with.}& Change\tablenote{bbare to compar e climate model situations with.}(\%)\\
%%% 209

%\landscape
\subsubsection*{Qualitative Differences}

The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.
The objectives of my talk are to compare climate model situations with
observed climatology and to demonstrate that state-of-the-model climate
models are credible simulators of the true climate system.


\begin{references}
\bibitem{smith82}Smith A., and Doe B., {\it J. Chem.\  Phys.}\ {\bf
76}, 4056 (1982).
\bibitem{jones78}Jones, C., {\it J. Chem.\ Phys.} {\bf 68}, 5298 (1978).
\bibitem{jonessmith80}Jones, C.,  and Smith, A.,
{\it Title of Book}, New York: IEEE Press, 1978, ch. 6, pp. 23-26.
\end{references}
 
\end{document}

  
