I would agree with Nick not to change the specification of the
constructor (except if
all TChain users agree with it...), but rather to add a new member
function. Or,
is it a stupid idea to construct automatically a chain name from the
tree name, keeping
the same constructor TChain(const char* treename) ? Something like
TChainOf_treename or so ?
-- APHECETCHE Laurent (mailto:aphecetche@ganil.fr) GANIL, B.P. 5027, 14076, Caen Cedex 5, France Vox: +33 (0)2 31 45 45 85 - Fax: +33 (0)2 31 45 46 65 WWW: http://ganp03.in2p3.fr/nof/ & (perso.) http://www.mygale.org/~p0mp0n